Bergantiños, G., Lorenzo, L. (2008) The equal award principle in problems with constraints and claims. European Journal of Operational Research 188, 224-239.

Bergantiños, G., Vidal-Puga, J. (2006) Additive rules in discrete allocation problems. European Journal of Operational Research 172, 971-978.

van den Brink, R., Funaki, Y., van der Laan, G. (2013) Characterization of the reverse Talmud bankruptcy rule by exemption and exclusion properties. European Journal of Operational Research 228, 413-417.

Calleja, P., Borm, P., Hendrickx, R. (2005) Multi-issue allocation situations. European Journal of Operational Research 164, 730-747.

Casas-Méndez, B., Fragnelli, V., García-Jurado, I. (2011) Weighted bankruptcy rules and the museum pass problem. European Journal of Operational Research 215, 161-168.

Chambers, C.P., Moreno-Ternero, J.D., (2017) Taxation and Poverty. Social Choice and Welfare 48, 153-175.

Chen, S., (2015) Systematic favorability in claims problems with indivisibilities. Social Choice and Welfare 44, 283-300.

Dagan N (1996) New characterizations of old bankruptcy rules. Social Choice and Welfare 13, 51-59.

Esta˜n, T., Llorca, N., Martínez, R., Sánchez-Soriano, J., (2021) On how to allocate the fixed cost of transport systems. Annals of Operations Research 301, 81-105.

Estévez-Fernández, A., Giménez-Gómez, J., Solís-Baltodano, M., (2021) Sequential bankruptcy problems. European Journal of Operational Research 292, 388-395.

Fragnelli, V., Gagliardo, S., Gastaldi, F., (2014) Integer solutions to bankruptcy problems with non-integer claims. TOP 22, 892-933.

Fragnelli, V., Gagliardo, S., Gastaldi, F., (2016) Bankruptcy problems with noninteger claims: definition and characterizations of the ICEA solution. TOP 24, 88-130.

Giménez-Gómez, J., Peris, J., (2014) A proportional approach to claims problems with a guaranteed minimum. European Journal of Operational Research 232, 109-116.

Gutiérrez, E., Llorca, N., Sánchez-Soriano, J., Mosquera, M. (2018) Sustainable allocation of greenhouse gas emission permits for firms with Leontief technologies. European Journal of Operational Research 269, 5-15.

Herrero, C., Martínez, R., (2008) Balanced allocation methods for claims problems with indivisibilities. Social Choice and Welfare 30, 603-617.

Herrero, C., Villar, A., (2001) The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems. Mathematical Social Sciences 42, 307-328.

Herrero, C., Villar, A., (2002) Sustainability in bankruptcy problems. TOP 10, 261-273.

Lahiri, S. (2001) Axiomatic characterizations of the CEA solution for rationing problems. European Journal of Operational Research 131, 162-170.

Long, Y., Sethuraman, J., Xue, J., (2021) Equal-quantile rules in resource allocation with uncertain needs. Journal of Economic Theory 105350

Long, Y., Xue, J., (2021) Parametric rationing with uncertain needs. SMU Mimeo. 

Moreno-Ternero, J.D., (2018) A Talmudic approach to bankruptcy problems in Mueller, D., and Trost, R., (eds.), Game Theory in Management Accounting. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham.

Moreno-Ternero, J., Vidal-Puga, J., (2021) Aggregator operators for dynamic rationing. European Journal of Operations Research 288, 682-691.

Moreno-Ternero J, Villar A (2004) The Talmud rule and the securement of agents’ awards. Mathematical Social Sciences 47, 245-257.

Moreno-Ternero, J.D., Villar, A. (2006) New characterizations of a classical bankruptcy rule. Review of Economic Design 10, 73-84.

Moulin H (2000) Priority rules and other asymmetric rationing methods. Econometrica 68, 643-684.

Moulin, H., (2002a) The proportional random allocation of indivisible units. Social Choice and Welfare 19, 381-413.

Moulin H., (2002b) Axiomatic cost and surplus-sharing, Chapter 6 of K. Arrow, A. Sen and K. Suzumura (eds.), The Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 1. North-Holland.

Moulin, H., (2007) On scheduling fees to prevent merging, splitting and transferring jobs. Mathematics of Operations Research 32, 266-283.

Moulin, H., (2008) Proportional scheduling, split-proofness, and merge-proofness. Games and Economic Behavior 63, 567-587.

Moulin, H., Stong, R., (2002) Fair queueing and other probabilistic allocation methods. Mathematics of Operations Research 27, 1-30.

Moulin, H., Stong, R., (2003) Filling a multicolor urn: an axiomatic analysis. Games and Economic Behavior 45, 242-269.

O’Neill B (1982) A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud. Mathematical Social Sciences 2, 345-371.

Pathak, P., Sonmez, T., Unver, U. Yenmez, B., (2020) Leaving No Ethical Value Behind: Triage Protocol Design for Pandemic Rationing. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 26951.

Tasnadi, A., (2002) On probabilisitic rationing. Mathematical Social Sciences 44, 211-221.

Thomson, W., (2003) Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey, Mathematical Social Sciences 45, 249-297.

Thomson, W., (2012) On the axiomatics of resource allocation: interpreting the consistency principle. Economics and Philosophy 28, 385-421.

Thomson W., (2015) Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update. Mathematical Social Sciences 74, 41-59.

Thomson, W., (2019) How to divide when there isn’t enough: from Aristotle, the Talmud, and Maimonides to the axiomatics of resource allocation, Econometric Society Monograph. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, MA.

Xue, J., (2018) Fair division with uncertain needs. Social Choice and Welfare 51, 105-136.

Yeh, C.-H., (2004) Sustainability, exemption, and the constrained equal awards rule: a note. Mathematical Social Sciences 47, 103-110

Yeh, C.-H., (2006) Protective properties and the constrained equal awards rule for claims problems: A note. Social Choice and Welfare 27, 221-230.

Yeh, C.-H., (2008) Secured lower bound, composition up, and minimal rights first for bankruptcy problems. Journal of Mathematical Economics 44, 925-932.

Young P (1987) On dividing an amount according to individual claims or liabilities. Mathematics of Operations Research 12, 398-414.

Young P (1988) Distributive justice in taxation. Journal of Economic Theory 44, 321-335.