References

Ali, H., Lecocq, S., and Visser, M. (2008). The impact of gurus: Parker grades and en primeur wine prices. Economic Journal, 118(529), F158–F173. (Reprinted in 2010 in the Journal of Wine Economics, 5(1), 22–39.)

Amerine, M., and Roessler, E. (1983). Wines: Their Sensory Evaluation. New York:W.H. Freeman.

Armstrong, W.E. (1939). The determinateness of the utility function. Economic Journal, 49(195), 453–467.

Ashton, R.H. (2012). Reliability and consensus of experienced wine judges: Expertise, within, and between? Journal of Wine Economics, 7(1), 70–87.

Ashton, R.H. (2013). Is there consensus among wine quality ratings of prominent critics? An empirical analysis of red Bordeaux, 2004–2010. Journal of Wine Economics, 8(2), 225–234.

Ashton, R.H. (2016). The value of expert opinion in the pricing of Bordeaux wine futures. Journal of Wine Economics, 11(2), 261–288.

Barberà, S., and Bossert, W. (2021). Aggregating opinions. Barcelona GSE Working Paper No. 1262.

Barberà, S., Bossert, W., and Suzumura, K. (2021). Daunou’s voting rule and the lexico- graphic assignment of priorities. Social Choice and Welfare, 56(2), 259–289.

Bodington, J. (2017). The distribution of ratings assigned to blind replicates. Journal of Wine Economics, 12(4), 363–369.

Bodington, J. (2020). Rate the raters: A note on wine judge consistency. Journal of Wine Economics, 15(4), 363–369.

Borda, J.-C. de (1781). M´emoire sur les ´elections au scrutin. M´emoires de l’Acad´emie Royale des Sciences ann´ee 1781, 657–665. Translated and reprinted in McLean, I., and Urken, A.B., eds. (1995). Classics of Social Choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, Chapter 5.

Cao, J. (2014). Quantifying randomness versus consensus in wine quality ratings. Journal of Wine Economics, 9(2), 202–213.

Cardebat, J., and Paroissien, E. (2015). Standardizing expert wine scores: An application for Bordeaux en primeur. Journal of Wine Economics, 10(3), 329–348.

Ching, S. (1996). A simple characterization of plurality rule. Journal of Economic Theory,71(1), 298–302.

Condorcet, M.J.A.N. de (1785). Essai sur l’application de l’analyse a` la probabilit´e des d´ecisions rendues a` la pluralit´e des voix. Paris: Imprimerie Royale. Translated and reprinted in part in McLean, I., and Urken, A.B., eds. (1995). Classics of Social Choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, Chapter 6.

Daunou, P.C.F. (1803). M´emoire sur les ´elections au scrutin. Paris: Baudouin, imprimeur de l’Institut National. Translated and reprinted in McLean, I., and Urken, A.B., eds. (1995). Classics of Social Choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, Chapter 11.

Fine, B., and Fine, K. (1974a). Social choice and individual ranking I. Review of Economic Studies, 41(3), 303–322.

Fine, B., and Fine, K. (1974b). Social choice and individual ranking II. Review of Eco- nomic Studies, 41(4), 459–475.

Fishburn, P.C. (1970). Intransitive indifference in preference theory: a survey. Operations Research, 18(2), 207–228.

Fogarty, J., and Sadler, R. (2014). To save or savor: A review of approaches for measuring wine as an investment. Journal of Wine Economics, 9(3), 225–248.

Friberg, R., and Gr¨onqvist, E. (2012). Do expert reviews affect the demand for wine? American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(1), 193–211.

Gergaud, O., Ginsburgh, V., and Moreno-Ternero, J. (2021). Wine Ratings: Seeking a consensus among tasters via normalization, approval, and aggregation. Journal of Wine Economics, 16(3), 321–342.

Ginsburgh, V., and Zang, I. (2012). Shapley ranking of wines. Journal of Wine Economics 7(2), 169–180.

Hulkower, N. (2009). The judgment of Paris according to Borda. Journal of Wine Re- search, 20(3), 171–182.

Jaeger, E. (1981). To save or savor: the rate of return to storing wine. Journal of Political Economy, 89(3), 584–592.

Luce, R.D. (1956). Semiorders and a theory of utility discrimination. Econometrica, 24(2), 178–191.

Luce, R.D., and Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and Decisions, New York: Wiley.

Lindley, D.V. (2006). Analysis of a wine tasting. Journal of Wine Economics, 1(1), 33–41.

May, K.O. (1952). A set of independent necessary and sufficient conditions for simple majority decision. Econometrica, 20(4), 680–684.

May, K.O. (1953). A note on the complete independence of the conditions for simple majority decision. Econometrica, 21(1), 172–173.

Morales, J.I. (1797). Memoria matem´atica sobre el c´alculo de la opinion en las elecciones. Madrid: Imprenta Real. Translated and reprinted in McLean, I., and Urken, A.B., eds. (1995). Classics of Social Choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, Chapter 10.

Richelson, J.T. (1978). A characterization result for the plurality rule. Journal of Eco- nomic Theory, 19(2), 548–550.

Smith, J.H. (1973). Aggregation of preferences with variable electorate. Econometrica, 41(6), 1027–1041.

Young, H.P. (1974). An axiomatization of Borda’s rule. Journal of Economic Theory, 9(1), 43–52.

Young, H.P. (1975), Social choice scoring functions. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathe- matics, 28(4), 824–838.