References

Akerlof, G. A. and Kranton, R. E. (2002). Identity and schooling: Some lessons for the economics of education. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(4):1167–1201.

Algan, Y., Cahuc, P., and Shleifer, A. (2013). Teaching practices and social capital. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(3):189–210.

Allgood, S., Walstad, W. B., and Siegfried, J. J. (2015). Research on teaching economics to under- graduates. Journal of Economic Literature, 53(2):285–325.

Aparicio Fenoll, A. and Zaccagni, S. (2022). Gender mix and team performance: Differences between exogenously and endogenously formed teams. Labour Economics, 79:102269.

Athey, S. and Imbens, G. W. (2017). The state of applied econometrics: Causality and policy evaluation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2):3–32.

Azmat, G., Bagues, M., Cabrales, A., and Iriberri, N. (2019). What you don’t know. . . can’t hurt you? a natural field experiment on relative performance feedback in higher education. Management Science, 65(8):3714–3736.

Becker, W. E. and Watts, M. (1996). Chalk and talk: A national survey on teaching undergraduate economics. The American Economic Review, 86(2):448–453.

Booij, A. S., Leuven, E., and Oosterbeek, H. (2016). Ability Peer Effects in University: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment. The Review of Economic Studies, 84(2):547–578.

Brady, R., Insler, M., and Rahman, A. (2017). Bad company: Understanding negative peer effects in college achievement. European Economic Review, 98(C):144–168.

Bramoullé, Y., Djebbari, H., and Fortin, B. (2020). Peer effects in networks: A survey. Annual Review of Economics, 12(1):603–629.

Brown-Kruse, J. and Hummels, D. (1993). Gender effects in laboratory public goods contribu- tion: Do individuals put their money where their mouth is? Journal of Economic Behavior Organization, 22(3):255–267.

Cadsby, C. B. and Maynes, E. (1998). Gender and free riding in a threshold public goods game: Experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior Organization, 34(4):603–620.

Carrell, S., Fullerton, R., and West, J. (2009). Does your cohort matter? measuring peer effects in college achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(3):439–464.

Cools, A., Fernández, R., and Patacchini, E. (2022). The asymmetric gender effects of high flyers. Labour Economics, 79:102287.

Coveney, M. and Oosterveen, M. (2021). What drives ability peer effects? European Economic Review, 136:103763.

Domina, T., McEachin, A., Hanselman, P., Agarwal, P., Hwang, N., and Lewis, R. W. (2019). Beyond tracking and detracking: The dimensions of organizational differentiation in schools. Sociology of Education, 92(3):293–322.

Duflo, E., Dupas, P., and Kremer, M. (2011). Peer effects, teacher incentives, and the impact of tracking: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in kenya. American Economic Review, 101(5):1739–74.

Feld, J. and Zölitz, U. (2017). Understanding peer effects: On the nature, estimation, and channels of peer effects. Journal of Labor Economics, 35:387–428.

Foster, G. (2006). It’s not your peers, and it’s not your friends: Some progress toward understanding the educational peer effect mechanism. Journal of Public Economics, 90(8-9):1455–1475.

Guryan, J., Kroft, K., and Notowidigdo, M. J. (2009). Peer effects in the workplace: Evidence from random groupings in professional golf tournaments. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(4):34–68.

Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1):153–162. Hidalgo-Hidalgo, M. (2014). Tracking can be more equitable than mixing. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 116(4):964–981.

Hoxby, C. (2000). Peer effects in the classroom: Learning from gender and race variation. Working Paper 7867, National Bureau of Economic Research.

Huynh, K. P., Jacho-Chávez, D. T., and Self, J. K. (2010). The efficacy of collaborative learning recitation sessions on student outcomes. American Economic Review, 100(2):287–91.

Izquierdo, S. S., Izquierdo, L. R., and López-Pintado, D. (2018). Mixing and diffusion in a two-type population. Royal Society Open Science, 5(2):172102.

Johnston, C. G., James, R. H., Lye, J. N., and McDonald, I. M. (2000). An evaluation of collabora- tive problem solving for learning economics. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1):13–29.

Karau, S. J. and Williams, K. D. (1995). Social loafing: Research findings, implications, and future directions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(5):134–140.

Kugihara, N. (1999). Gender and social loafing in japan. The Journal of Social Psychology, 139(4):516–526.

Lazear, E. P. (2001). Educational production. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(3):777–803.

Lu, F. and Anderson, M. L. (2015). Peer effects in microenvironments: The benefits of homoge- neous classroom groups. Journal of Labor Economics, 33(1):91–122.

López-Pintado, D. and Meléndez-Jiménez, M. A. (2021). Far above others. Journal of Economic Theory, 198:105376.

Manski, C. F. (2013). Identification of treatment response with social interactions. The Economic Journal, 16(1):S1–S23.

Marburger, D. R. (2005). Comparing student performance using cooperative learning. International Review of Economics Education, 4(1):46–57.

Niederle, M. and Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do Women Shy Away From Competition? Do Men Compete Too Much? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3):1067–1101.

Oosterbeek, H. and Van Ewijk, R. (2014). Gender peer effects in university: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Economics of Education Review, 38(C):51–63.

Sacerdote, B. (2014). Experimental and quasi-experimental analysis of peer effects: Two steps forward? Annual Review of Economics, 6(1):253–272.

Yamarik, S. (2007). Does cooperative learning improve student learning outcomes? The Journal of Economic Education, 38(3):259–277.

Zimmerman, D. J. (2003). Peer effects in academic outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(1):9–23.