Los Derechos Humanos en la opinión consultiva sobre armas nucleares de 1996

Nieves Irene  Caballero-Pérez

doi:10.46661/revintpensampolit.4775

Autores/as

Nieves Irene Caballero-Pérez Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla, España

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46661/revintpensampolit.4775

Palabras clave:

Tribunal Internacional de Justicia, Derechos Humanos, Derecho Internacional Humanitario, principio Lotus, principio non liquet

Resumen

En la Opinión Consultiva de 8 de julio de 1996, el Tribunal Internacional de Justicia debía dictaminar sobre si la amenaza o uso de armas nucleares era legal conforme al Derecho Internacional, su resolución supuso un precedente esencial sobre la prevención de los Derechos Humanos como principio del Derecho Internacional. La decisión del Tribunal recordó la importancia de velar por el cumplimiento de los Derechos Humanos a través de la aplicación de sus normas internas. En la presente comunicación se analizará dicha opinión consultiva, sus antecedentes jurisprudenciales y su posterior impacto en las normas del Derecho Internacional.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Bedi, Shiv R.S. (2007). “The development of Human Rights Law by the judges of the International Court of Justice”. Studies in International Law, Volume 10, Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Carta de las Naciones Unidas de 26 de junio de 1945.

Convención de Ginebra sobre la Prevención y Sanción del delito de Genocidio de 9 de diciembre de 1948.

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (2003). “Opinión Consultiva sobre la Condición Jurídica y derechos de los migrantes indocumentados, Voto Concurrente del Juez A.A. Cançado Trindade”. Opinión Consultiva, nº de referencia OC18/03, Serie A, nº 18, de 17 de septiembre de 2003. Disponible en: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/cf/Jurisprudencia2/busqueda_opiniones_consultivas.cfm?lang=es [1 de junio de 2019].

Declaración de Río de Janeiro de 1992, del 3 al 14 de junio.

Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos de 10 de diciembre de 1948.

Estatuto del Tribunal Internacional de Justicia de 26 de junio de 1945.

Handeyside, Hugh. (2007). “The Lotus Principle in ICJ Jurisprudence: Was the Ship ever Afloat?”, Michigan Journal of International Law, Volume 29, Issue 1.

Hertogen, An. (2016). “Letting Lotus Bloom”, The European Journal of International Law, Volume 26, Issue 4. Italy: European University Institute.

Higgins, Rosalyn. (1994). Problems and Process: International Law and How we use it. Oxford: Clarendon Press Publication.

Higgins, Rosalyn. (1998). “The International Court of Justice and Human Rights”, en Wellens, Karen C. [ed.], International Law: Theory and Practice. Essays in Honour of Eric Suy. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

International Court of Justice. (1950a). “Interpretation of Peace Treaties with Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania. First Phase”. Advisory Opinion, General List nº 8, of 30 March 1950.

International Court of Justice. (1950b). “Interpretation of Peace Treaties with Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania. Second Phase”. Advisory Opinion, General List nº 8, of 18 July 1950.

International Court of Justice. (1966). “South West Africa Cases (Ethiopia v. South Africa; Liberia v. South Africa). Second Phase”. Judgment, General List nº 46 & 47, of 18 July 1966. Disponible en: https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/47/judgments [12 de mayo 2019].

International Court of Justice. (1971). “Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970)”. Advisory Opinion, General List nº 53, of 21 June 1971. Disponible en: https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/53 [9 de mayo de 2019].

International Court of Justice. (1986). “Case concerning military and paramilitary activities in and against Nicaragua, Nicaragua v. United States of America, Merits”. Judgment, General List nº 70, of 27 June 1986. Disponible en: https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/70/judgments [7 de mayo 2019].

International Court of Justice. (1996). “Legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons”. Advisory Opinion, General List nº 95, of 8 July 1996. Disponible en: https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/95 [5 de mayo de 2019].

International Court of Justice. (2011). “Case Concerning Application of the International Convention on The Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Georgia v. Russian Federation), Preliminary Objections”. Judgment, General List nº 140, of 1 April 2011.

International Court of Justice. (2017). “Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of The Financing of Terrorism and of The International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Ukraine v. Russian Federation). Request for the indication of Provisional Measures”. Order, General List nº 166, of 19 April 2017.

International Court of Justice. (2018). “Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Qatar V. United Arab Emirates). Request for the indication of Provisional Measures”. Order, General List nº 172, of 23 July 2018.

International Court of Justice. (2019). “Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Qatar V. United Arab Emirates). Request for the indication of Provisional Measures”. Order, General List nº 172, of 14 June 2019.

Macklem, Patrick. (2015). The Sovereignty of Human Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.

Nino, Carlos Santiago. (1989). Ética y Derechos Humanos. Un ensayo de fundamentación”. Ariel Derecho. Barcelona: Ariel.

O’Neill, Teresa. (2017). Rethinking the Lotus Principle: New perspectives on the Kosovo Advisory Opinion, Supervisor: Jeutner, Valentin. Master Thesis, Spring, International Human Rights Law, Faculty of Law, Sweden: Lund University.

Pérez Luño, Antonio-Enrique. (2007). Los Derechos Fundamentales. Temas Clave de la Constitución Española. Madrid: Tecnos, 8ª Edición.

Permanent Court of International Justice. (1927). “The Case of the S.S. Lotus, France v. Turkey”, Judgment, 7 September 1927. Publications of the Permanent Court of International Justice, No. 10, Series A. Disponible en: https://www.icj-cij.org/en/pcij-series-a [5 de mayo de 2019].

Rieter, Eva. (2019). “The International Court of Justice and its contribution to Human Rights Law”, en Kadelbach, Stefan; Rensmann, Thilo y Rieter, Eva [eds.], Judging International Human Rights. Courts of General Jurisdiction as Human Courts. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing A.G.

Sáenz de Santamaría, Paz Andrés. (2012). Sistema de Derecho Internacional Público. Navarra: Thomson Reuders, Civitas, 2ª Edición.

Švarc Pipan, Dominika. (2018). “The contribution of the International Court of Justice to the promotion and protection of Human Rights”. En Follesdal, Andreas; y Ulfstein, Geir [eds]. The Judicialization of International Law: A mixed blessing? The United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Zyberi, Gentian. (2008). The Humanitarian Face of the International Court of Justice. Its Contribution to Interpreting and Developing International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Rules and Principles. Supervisor: Flinterman, Cees; and Gill, Terry, The Netherlands: Utretch University. Disponible en: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/26885 [18 de

abril de 2019].