Principles, Antinomies, Defeseability… Mysteries and Aporias of Neo-Constitutionalism and its Close Relatives

Authors

  • Juan Antonio García Amado Universidad de León, León, España

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46661/revintpensampolit.7546

Keywords:

Legal positivism, Iusmoralism, Principles , Constitutionalism

Abstract

Current legal theories that are contrary to legal positivism are necessarily associated with moral objectivism. They put true morality above positive legal norms and also above the constitution, and make true morality the authentic constitution. Since morality is the most important thing in the Law and morality is presented in the Law in the form of principles, there are no antinomies between the principles and there are no unfair legal principles.

References

Alexy, R. (2007). Teoría de los derechos fundamentales, Madrid, Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, trad. de Carlos Bernal Pulido.

Atienza, M., Ruiz Manero, J. (1996), Las piezas del Derecho, Barcelona, Ariel.

Ruiz Manero, J., (2018) “Rule of law y ponderación. Un límite de la ponderación y una insuficiencia de su teoría estándar”, en Juan Ruiz Manero, Juan Pablo Alonso (coords.), Imperio de la ley y ponderación de principios, Buenos Aires, Astrea.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-27

Issue

Section

Monográfico 2

How to Cite

Principles, Antinomies, Defeseability… Mysteries and Aporias of Neo-Constitutionalism and its Close Relatives. (2022). International Journal of Political Thought, 17(1), 273-290. https://doi.org/10.46661/revintpensampolit.7546