Soft power and the civilizing logic of globalization

a cultural critique of neo-civilizational dynamics

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46661/ccselap-12257

Palavras-chave:

Soft power, Civilizing mission, Postcolonial theory, Cultural hegemony, Global South, Symbolic power

Resumo

 

 

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Brady, A. (2012). Marketing dictatorship: Propaganda and thought work in contemporary China. Rowman & Littlefield.

Canagarajah, S. (2002). A geopolitics of academic writing. University of Pittsburgh Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5hjn6c

Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton University Press.

Conklin, A. L. (1997). A mission to civilize: The republican idea of empire in France and West Africa, 1895-1930. Stanford University Press.

Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press.

Fanon, F. (1963). The wretched of the earth (C. Farrington, Trans.). Grove Press.

Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith, Eds. & Trans.). International Publishers.

Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. Sage.

Iwabuchi, K. (2015). Reshaping global cultural flows: The "repacking" of cultural difference in global media. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(6), 575-591.

Larkin, B. (2008). Signal and noise: Media, infrastructure, and urban culture in Nigeria. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1220mnp

Lugones, M. (2008). Coloniality of gender. Worlds & Knowledges Otherwise, 2, 1-17.

Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5

Madouni, A. (2021). The cultural invasion and its impact on security breakthroughs of the nation. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 12(8), 843-863. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.1003799

Mbembe, A. (2001). On the postcolony. University of California Press.

Mehta, U. S. (1999). Liberalism and empire: A study in nineteenth-century British liberal thought. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226519180.001.0001

Mignolo, W. D. (2000). Local histories/global designs: Coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton University Press.

Mignolo, W. D. (2011). The darker side of Western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv125jqbw

Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. PublicAffairs.

Oliveira, G. (2011). The geopolitics of Brazilian telenovelas. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 14(2), 173-188.

Parmar, I. (2012). Foundations of the American century: The Ford, Carnegie, and Rockefeller foundations in the rise of American power. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/parm14628

Pennycook, A. (1998). English and the discourses of colonialism. Routledge.

Phillipson, R. (2009). Linguistic imperialism continued. Routledge.

Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology, 15(2), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005

Rizvi, F. (2007). Internationalization of curriculum: A critical perspective. In M. Hayden, J. Levy, & J. Thompson (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of research in international education (pp. 390-403). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607866.n33

Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.

Schiller, H. I. (1976). Communication and cultural domination. International Arts and Sciences Press.

Thussu, D. K. (2010). International communication: Continuity and change (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury.

Thussu, D. K. (2018). International communication: A reader (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Wayne, M. (2020). Netflix, globalization, and the digital intermediaries of culture. Critical Studies in Television, 15(3), 233-253.

Wynter, S. (2003). Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation-An argument. CR: The New Centennial Review, 3(3), 257-337. https://doi.org/10.1353/ncr.2004.0015

Downloads

Publicado

2026-06-29

Como Citar

Ben Salem, H. (2026). Soft power and the civilizing logic of globalization: a cultural critique of neo-civilizational dynamics. Comparative Cultural Studies: European and Latin American Perspectives, 1(22), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.46661/ccselap-12257