Artificial intelligence in judicial decision-making: a tool or a threat to due process?
Analysis from the perspective of algorithmic transparency and fundamental rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46661/respublica.13589Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Judicial Decision-Making, Due Process, Algorithmic TransparencyAbstract
This article analyses the main legal and ethical challenges associated with the use of artificial intelligence systems in the judicial process, with a particular focus on algorithmic transparency, equality, non-discrimination and human dignity. Using a qualitative methodology of a documentary and legal-dogmatic nature, the article examines international experiences, regulatory developments and emerging standards regarding the governance of artificial intelligence, including the European Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act). It argues that artificial intelligence should operate as a tool complementary to judicial reasoning and not as a substitute for human judgement. Finally, it is concluded that the legitimacy of its implementation in the administration of justice depends on the existence of effective mechanisms for human oversight, transparency, accountability and the comprehensive protection of fundamental rights.
Downloads
References
Consejo de Europa. (2024). Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law. Retrieved 2026, from https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence/the-framework-convention-on-artificial-intelligence
Cumbre Judicial Iberoamericana. (2014, abril 2). CÓDIGO IBEROAMERICANO DE ÉTICA JUDICIAL. Retrieved June 3, 2026, from https://www.oas.org/juridico/PDFs/mesicic5_mex_ane_57.pdf
GANGI GUILLEN, Giuseppe. Kodjack. VII. (2025). United States’ strategic shift and International Humanitarian Law: Implications for the Russia-Ukraine war. Revista Científica General José María Córdova, 23(49), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.21830/19006586.1467
GANGI GUILLÉN, Giuseppe. Kodjack. VII. & Delgado Morán, Juan José. (2025). Derechos Humanos y Terrorismo. El terrorismo en Europa: la salvaguarda de la seguridad y la protección de las víctimas. Ed. Sindéresis. ISBN: 979-13-87929-25-1
GANGI GUILLÉN, Giuseppe. Kodjack. VII. (2026). Innovación en la enseñanza del Derecho Internacional Humanitario: simulaciones para asesores jurídicos operacionales. “Revolución en las aulas: cómo la innovación está reescribiendo la universidad”. Ed. Colex. https://doi.org/10.69592/979-13-7011-516-6-CAP-6
GANGI GUILLÉN, Giuseppe. Kodjack. VII. (2025). Derechos humanos y derecho penal en la era de la inteligencia artificial: retos y propuestas. Cuadernos de RES PUBLICA en derecho y criminología, https://doi.org/10.46661/respublica.11635
Organización de las Naciones Unidas. (1966, diciembre 16). Pacto Internacional de Derechos Civiles y Políticos. ohchr. Retrieved June 3, 2026, from https://www.ohchr.org/es/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights
Parlamento Europeo y del consejo. (2024, June 13). DOUE-L-2024-81079 Reglamento (UE) 2024/1689 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 13 de junio de 2024, por el que se establecen normas armonizadas en materia de inteligencia artificial y por el que se modifican los Reglamentos (CE) nº 300 ... BOE.es. Retrieved June 3, 2026, from https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=DOUE-L-2024-81079
Parlamento Europeo y Consejo Europeo. (2018). CEPEJ European Ethical Charter on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in judicial systems and their environment - European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). The Council of Europe. Retrieved June 3, 2026, from https://www.coe.int/en/web/cepej/cepej-european-ethical-charter-on-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-ai-in-judicial-systems-and-their-environment
ROA AVELLA Marcela. del. Pilar. (2022, enero-abril). Uso del algoritmo COMPAS en el proceso penal y los riesgos a los derechos humanos. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v8i1.615
SANDOVAL, Lilian Judith. (2018, octubre 18). Algoritmos de aprendizaje automático para análisis y predicción de datos. REDICCES, (11), 2-3. http://redicces.org.sv/jspui/bitstream/10972/3626/1/Art6_RT2018.pdf
SANTANA RAMOS, Emilia María. (2026, enero-junio). ¿Inteligencias enfrentadas? una reflexión sobre la justicia. Justicia y Derecho, 23(41), 44. https://revistajd.tsp.gob.cu/index.php/JD/en/issue/view/85
SOURDIN, Tania. (2025, October 21). Judge v robot? Artificial intelligence and judicial decision-making 1. Judicial Commission of NSW. Retrieved June 3, 2026, https://doi.org/10.53637/ZGUX2213
UNESCO. (2021). Recomendación sobre la ética de la inteligencia artificial. UNESCO Digital Library. Retrieved June 3, 2026, from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137_spa
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yesica Andrea López Alarcón
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
