Ethical Leadership and Creative Personality:
Competitive Advantages through Intrinsic Motivation and Creative Self-Efficacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46661/rev.metodoscuant.econ.empresa.12557Keywords:
Ethical leadership, intrinsic motivation, creative self-efficacy, creative personality, organizational psychologyAbstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze how ethical leadership affects creative personality, transcending the classic focus on observable creative behaviors to focus on dispositional traits. Using a sample of 448 professionals from the Colombian electricity sector and a sequential mediation model, the role of intrinsic motivation and creative self-efficacy as explanatory mechanisms was examined. The results show that ethical leadership significantly strengthens creative personality and that this effect is enhanced when employees experience high levels of intrinsic motivation and confidence in their own abilities. This finding expands existing theoretical frameworks by introducing the notion of the “dispositional footprint” of ethical leadership on creative capital, providing empirical evidence that managerial ethics can shape stable psychological predispositions. The study also contributes to the organizational field by demonstrating that creativity can be managed as a sustainable competitive advantage, reinforced by ethical leadership practices that consolidate innovative, resilient, and socially responsible talent.
Downloads
References
Afsar, B., Bibi, A., & Umrani, W. A. (2020). Ethical leadership and service innovative behaviour of hotel employees: the role of organisational identification and proactive personality. International Journal of Management Practice, 13(5), 503-520. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMP.2020.110003
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184. https://doi.org/10.5465/256995
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128
Ashfaq, F., Abid, G., & Ilyas, S. (2021). Impact of ethical leadership on employee engagement: role of self-efficacy and organizational commitment. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11(3), 962-974. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe11030071
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Barnett, A. (2024). Self-efficacy. In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 6235-6238). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_2631
Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(4), 355-429. https://doi.org/10.3200/MONO.132.4.355-430
Bedi, A., Alpaslan, C. M., & Green, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of ethical leadership outcomes and moderators. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(3), 517-536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2625-1
Bracht, E. M., Monzani, L., Boer, D., Haslam, S. A., Kerschreiter, R., Lemoine, J. E., ... & van Dick, R. (2023). Innovation across cultures: Connecting leadership, identification, and creative behavior in organizations. Applied Psychology, 72(1), 348-388. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12381
Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. (2007). The influence of leaders' and other referents' normative expectations on individual involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.11.001
Chen, A. S. Y., & Hou, Y. H. (2016). The effects of ethical leadership, voice behavior and climates for innovation on creativity: A moderated mediation examination. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.007
Chen, T., Kim, T. Y., Gong, Y., & Liang, Y. (2025). Competence Drives Interest or Vice Versa? Untangling the Bidirectional Relationships between Creative Self‐Efficacy and Intrinsic Motivation for Creativity in Shaping Employee Creativity. Journal of Management Studies, 62(2), 775-811. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13072
Christensen-Salem, A., Walumbwa, F. O., Hsu, C. I. C., Misati, E., Babalola, M. T., & Kim, K. (2021). Unmasking the creative self-efficacy–creative performance relationship: the roles of thriving at work, perceived work significance, and task interdependence. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(22), 4820-4846. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1710721
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
Demir, S. (2022). Comparison of normality tests in terms of sample sizes under different skewness and Kurtosis coefficients. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(2), 397-409. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1101295
Duan, S., Liu, Z., & Che, H. (2018). Mediating influences of ethical leadership on employee creativity. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(2), 323-337. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6160
Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 1(1), 23-43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305
Eva, N., Newman, A., Zhou, A. J., & Zhou, S. S. (2020). The relationship between ethical leadership and employees’ internal and external community citizenship behaviors: The mediating role of prosocial motivation. Personnel Review, 49(2), 636-652. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-01-2019-0019
Febriyanti, M. D., & Nugroho, S. P. (2023). Pengaruh ethical leadership terhadap innovation work behavior dengan lmx dan self-efficacy sebagai variabel mediasi. IQTISHAD Equity Jurnal Manajemen, 6(1), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.51804/iej.v6i1.16287
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290-309. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
Feng, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Zhang, L., & Han, X. (2018). Just the right amount of ethics inspires creativity: A cross-level investigation of ethical leadership, intrinsic motivation, and employee creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(3), 645-658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3297-1
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437810180010
Gong, Y., Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765-778. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.43670890
Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1398–1405. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1398
Gu, J., He, C., & Liu, H. (2017). Supervisory styles and graduate student creativity: the mediating roles of creative self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation. Studies in Higher Education, 42(4), 721-742. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1072149
Gumusluoglu, L., & Ilsev, A. (2009). Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 461-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.07.032
Haase, J., Hoff, E. V., Hanel, P. H., & Innes-Ker, Å. (2018). A meta-analysis of the relation between creative self-efficacy and different creativity measurements. Creativity Research Journal, 30(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1411436
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100
Hempel, P. S., Zhang, Z. X., & Tjosvold, D. (2009). Conflict management between and within teams for trusting relationships and performance in China. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 30(1), 41-65. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.540
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., & Zhou, J. (2009). A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 280-293. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.37308035
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Hu, Y., Zhu, L., Zhou, M., Li, J., Maguire, P., Sun, H., & Wang, D. (2018). Exploring the influence of ethical leadership on voice behavior: how leader-member exchange, psychological safety and psychological empowerment influence employees’ willingness to speak out. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(1), 1718. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01718
Ilyas, S., Abid, G., & Ashfaq, F. (2020). Ethical leadership in sustainable organizations: The moderating role of general self-efficacy and the mediating role of organizational trust. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 22, 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.03.003
Islam, T., Hussain, D., Ahmed, I., & Sadiq, M. (2021). Ethical leadership and environment specific discretionary behaviour: the mediating role of green human resource management and moderating role of individual green values. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de L'Administration, 38(4), 442-459. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1637
Javed, B., Khan, A. A., Bashir, S., & Arjoon, S. (2017). Impact of ethical leadership on creativity: the role of psychological empowerment. Current Issues in Tourism, 20(8), 839-851. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2016.1188894
Jiang, Z., Huo, M. L., Jones, J., Cheng, Z., Manoharan, A., & Spoehr, J. (2025). Thriving in future work: knowledge management and innovation perspectives. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 23(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2024.2344347
Jing, L., Chen, R., Jing, L., Qiao, Y., Lou, J., Xu, J., ... & Sun, X. (2017). Development and enrolee satisfaction with basic medical insurance in China: A systematic review and stratified cluster sampling survey. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 32(3), 285-298. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2430
Kalshoven, K., Den Hartog, D. N., & De Hoogh, A. H. (2011). Ethical leadership at work questionnaire (ELW): Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 51-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.007
Karimi, S., Malek, F. A., & Farani, A. Y. (2022). The relationship between proactive personality and employees’ creativity: the mediating role of intrinsic motivation and creative self-efficacy. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 35(1), 4500-4519. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.2013913
Karwowski, M., Jankowska, D. M., Brzeski, A., Czerwonka, M., Gajda, A., Lebuda, I., & Beghetto, R. A. (2020). Delving into creativity and learning. In Creative Learning in Digital and Virtual Environments (pp. 7-29). Routledge.
Katz‐Buonincontro, J., & Anderson, R. C. (2020). A review of articles using observation methods to study creativity in education (1980–2018). The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 508-524. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.385
Khan, M., Mahmood, A., & Shoaib, M. (2022). Role of ethical leadership in improving employee outcomes through the work environment, work-life quality and ICT skills: A setting of China-Pakistan economic corridor. Sustainability, 14(17), 11055. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711055
Khan, S. N., Mubasher, M., Khan, I. U., Rehman, H. M., & Khan, S. U. (2021). The influence of personality traits on sustainability-oriented entrepreneurial intentions: the moderating role of servant leadership. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(9), 13707-13730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01235-0
Kim, B. J., Kim, M. J., & Kim, T. H. (2021). “The power of ethical leadership”: The influence of corporate social responsibility on creativity, the mediating function of psychological safety, and the moderating role of ethical leadership. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(6), 2968. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062968
Kwon Choi, B., Koo Moon, H., & Ko, W. (2013). An organization's ethical climate, innovation, and performance: Effects of support for innovation and performance evaluation. Management Decision, 51(6), 1250-1275. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-Sep-2011-0334
Lebuda, I., Karwowski, M., Galang, A. J. R., Szumski, G., & Firkowska-Mankiewicz, A. (2021). Personality predictors of creative achievement and lawbreaking behavior. Current Psychology, 40(8), 3629-3638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00306-w
Li, G., Li, L., Xie, L., & Lopez, O. S. (2024). The effects of ethical leadership on creativity: A conservation of resources perspective. Current Psychology, 43(6), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04703-0
Liden, R. C., Wang, X., & Wang, Y. (2025). The evolution of leadership: Past insights, present trends, and future directions. Journal of Business Research, 186(1), 115036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115036
Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114
Liu, X., Huang, Y., Kim, J., & Na, S. (2023). How ethical leadership cultivates innovative work behaviors in employees? Psychological safety, work engagement and openness to experience. Sustainability, 15(4), 3452. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043452
Luescher, R., Barthelmess, P. Y. Z., Kim, S. Y., Richter, U. H., & Mittag, M. (2019). Conceptualizing creativity: general and cultural biases in Gough's creative personality scale. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.160
Malik, O. F., Shahzad, A., Waheed, A., & Yousaf, Z. (2020). Abusive supervision as a trigger of malevolent creativity: do the Light Triad traits matter? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(8), 1119-1137. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-09-2019-0386
Moss, S. E., Song, M., Hannah, S. T., Wang, Z., & Sumanth, J. J. (2020). The duty to improve oneself: How duty orientation mediates the relationship between ethical leadership and followers’ feedback-seeking and feedback-avoiding behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 165(4), 615-631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4095-8
Mumford, M. D., Fichtel, M., England, S., & Newbold, T. R. (2023). Leader thinking, follower thinking: Leader impacts on follower creative performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 413-440. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-045553
Newman, A., Schwarz, G., Cooper, B., & Sendjaya, S. (2017). How servant leadership influences organizational citizenship behavior: The roles of LMX, empowerment, and proactive personality. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2827-6
Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2008). The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 392. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.392
Özbağ, G. K. (2016). The role of personality in leadership: Five factor personality traits and ethical leadership. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 235-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.019
Peng, A. C., & Kim, D. (2020). A meta‐analytic test of the differential pathways linking ethical leadership to normative conduct. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(4), 348-368. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2427
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Rasheed, M. I., Hameed, Z., Kaur, P., & Dhir, A. (2024). Too sleepy to be innovative? Ethical leadership and employee service innovation behavior: a dual-path model moderated by sleep quality. Human Relations, 77(6), 739-767. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267231163040
Resick, C. J., Hanges, P. J., Dickson, M. W., & Mitchelson, J. K. (2006). A cross-cultural examination of the endorsement of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(4), 345-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3242-1
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61(1), 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Salanova, M., Rodríguez-Sánchez, A. M., & Nielsen, K. (2022). The impact of group efficacy beliefs and transformational leadership on followers’ self-efficacy: A multilevel-longitudinal study. Current Psychology, 41(4), 2024-2033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00722-3
Santiago-Torner, C. (2023a). Relación entre liderazgo ético y motivación intrínseca: El rol mediador de la creatividad y el múltiple efecto moderador del compromiso de continuidad. Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa, 36, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.46661/rev.metodoscuant.econ.empresa.7406
Santiago-Torner, C. (2023b). Teletrabajo y clima ético: El efecto mediador de la autonomía laboral y del compromiso organizacional. Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa, 36, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.46661/rev.metodoscuant.econ.empresa.7540
Santiago-Torner, C. (2024). Teletrabajo y autoeficacia laboral: el papel moderador de la creatividad y el mediador de la motivación intrínseca. Innovar: Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociales, 34(91), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v34n91.102656
Santiago-Torner, C. (2025). Ethical leadership and organizational commitment in the Colombian electricity sector: the importance of work self-efficacy. Tec Empresarial, 19(1), 68-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.18845/te.v19i1.7579
Santiago-Torner, C., Corral-Marfil, J. A., Jiménez-Pérez, Y., & Tarrats-Pons, E. (2025a). Impact of ethical leadership on autonomy and self-efficacy in virtual work environments: The disintegrating effect of an egoistic climate. Behavioral Sciences, 15(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15010095
Santiago-Torner, C., Jiménez-Pérez, Y., & Tarrats-Pons, E. (2025b). Ethical climate, intrinsic motivation, and affective commitment: The impact of depersonalization. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 15(4), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe15040055
Shahid, I., Anwar Ul Haq, M., Di Virgilio, F., & Ahmed, M. A. (2023). Ethical leadership and individual ambidexterity: the mediating role of equity sensitivity and the moderating role of openness to experience. Management Research Review, 46(12), 1727-1747. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-06-2022-0418
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933-958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007
Shareef, R. A., & Atan, T. (2019). The influence of ethical leadership on academic employees’ organizational citizenship behavior and turnover intention: Mediating role of intrinsic motivation. Management Decision, 57(3), 583-605. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2017-0721
Shaw, A., Kapnek, M., & Morelli, N. A. (2021). Measuring creative self-efficacy: An item response theory analysis of the creative self-efficacy scale. Frontiers in Ppsychology, 12(1), 678033. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.678033
Snyder, H. T., Sowden, P. T., Silvia, P. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2021). The creative self: Do people distinguish creative self-perceptions, efficacy, and personal identity? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15(4), 627–636. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000317
Su, X., Lin, W., Wu, J., Zheng, Q., Chen, X., & Jiang, X. (2021). Ethical leadership and knowledge sharing: the effects of positive reciprocity and moral efficacy. Sage Open, 11(2), 21582440211021823. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211021823
Sun, Y., Hong, J. C., & Ye, J. H. (2022). The effects of employees’ perceived intrinsic motivation on knowledge sharing and creative self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(1), 762994. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.762994
Tan, C. S., Lau, X. S., Kung, Y. T., & Kailsan, R. A. L. (2019). Openness to experience enhances creativity: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation and the creative process engagement. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(1), 109-119. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.170
Tang, M., Hofreiter, S., Werner, C. H., Zielińska, A., & Karwowski, M. (2024). “Who” Is the Best Creative Thinking Partner? An Experimental Investigation of Human–Human, Human–Internet, and Human–AI Co‐Creation. The Journal of Creative Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.1519
Tantawy, M., Herbert, K., McNally, J. J., Mengel, T., Piperopoulos, P., & Foord, D. (2021). Bringing creativity back to entrepreneurship education: Creative self-efficacy, creative process engagement, and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 15(1) e00239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2021.e00239
Tao, R., Zhang, H., Geng, L., Li, Y., & Qiu, J. (2024). The influence of trait and state creative self-efficacy on creative behavior: An experimental study using false feedback. Behavioral Sciences, 15(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15010018
Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500
Tett, R. P., Toich, M. J., & Ozkum, S. B. (2021). Trait activation theory: A review of the literature and applications to five lines of personality dynamics research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8(1), 199-233. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-062228
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137-1148. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069429
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020952
Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 591-620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00173.x
Tse, H. H., To, M. L., & Chiu, W. C. (2018). When and why does transformational leadership influence employee creativity? The roles of personal control and creative personality. Human Resource Management, 57(1), 145-157. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21855
Tu, Y., Lu, X., Choi, J. N., & Guo, W. (2019). Ethical leadership and team-level creativity: Mediation of psychological safety climate and moderation of supervisor support for creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(2), 551-565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3839-9
Wadei, K. A., Chen, L., Frempong, J., & Appienti, W. A. (2021). The mediation effect of ethical leadership and creative performance: A social information processing perspective. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(1), 241-254. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.449
Walumbwa, F. O., Mayer, D. M., Wang, P., Wang, H., Workman, K., & Christensen, A. L. (2011a). Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 204-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.11.002
Walumbwa, F. O., Morrison, E. W., & Christensen, A. L. (2011b). Ethical leadership and group in-role performance: The mediating roles of group conscientiousness and group voice. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 953–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.005
Williams, L. J., Hartman, N., & Cavazotte, F. (2010). Method variance and marker variables: A review and comprehensive CFA marker technique. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 477–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110366036
Xue, H., Luo, Y., Luan, Y., & Wang, N. (2022). A meta-analysis of leadership and intrinsic motivation: Examining relative importance and moderators. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(1), 941161. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.941161
Yidong, T., & Xinxin, L. (2013). How ethical leadership influence employees’ innovative work behavior: A perspective of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(2), 441-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1455-7
Zhang, J. W., Howell, R. T., Razavi, P., Shaban-Azad, H., Chai, W. J., Ramis, T., Mello, Z., Anderson, C. L., Monroy, M., & Keltner, D. (2024). Awe is associated with creative personality, convergent creativity, and everyday creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 18(2), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000442
Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48037118
Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
Zhou, J., Oldham, G. R., Chuang, A., & Hsu, R. S. (2022). Enhancing employee creativity: Effects of choice, rewards and personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(3), 503–513. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000900
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Carlos Santiago-Torner

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Submission of manuscripts implies that the work described has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere and that, in case of acceptance, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the Journal for its publication and dissemination. Authors retain the authors' right to use and share the article according to a personal or instutional use or scholarly sharing purposes; in addition, they retain patent, trademark and other intellectual property rights (including research data).
All the articles are published in the Journal under the Creative Commons license CC-BY-SA (Attribution-ShareAlike). It is allowed a commercial use of the work (always including the author attribution) and other derivative works, which must be released under the same license as the original work.
Up to Volume 21, this Journal has been licensing the articles under the Creative Commons license CC-BY-SA 3.0 ES. Starting from Volume 22, the Creative Commons license CC-BY-SA 4.0 is used.



