Deontic powers and reasons to act independently of desire

Authors

  • Isabel Victoria Lucena Cid Universidad Pablo de Olavide

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46661/revintpensampolit.10500

Keywords:

Policy, deontic power, institutional facts, political system, status function

Abstract

This article analyses Searle’s thesis which states that all political power represents a deontic power related to rights, duties, obligations, authorizations, permissions, authority, etc. This concept leads us to the understanding that power and constituent status functions are irremediably tied to collective acceptance and constitutive rules. Notions like the linguistic constitution of deontic powers, reasons to act independently of desire, normative rationality, and the collective acceptance of political systems, constitute some of the cornerstones of a conceptual frame whose realistic vision of the social, institutional, and political has important implications in the fields of legal, political, and moral philosophy.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Isabel Victoria Lucena Cid, Universidad Pablo de Olavide

Profesora Titular

Departamento Derecho Público

References

Abad Cisneros, A., y Trak, J. M. (2013). Desafección política en Bolivia, Ecuador y Venezuela en 2010: un análisis comparado. Cuadernos Del Cendes, 30(82), 35-66

Ahmed, S. (2014). Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748691142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748691142

Almond, G. A., y Verba, S. (1989). The Civic culture revisited. Sage Publications.

Almond, G. A., y Verba, S. (1970). La cultura cívica: estudio sobre la participación política democrática en cinco naciones.

Euramérica.

Bloch, E., Plaice, N., Plaice, S., y Knight, P. (1995). The Principle of Hope, Volume 1. MIT Press.

Clarke, H. D., Dutt, N., y Kornberg, A. (1993). The Political Economy of Attitudes toward Polity and Society in Western European Democracies. The Journal of Politics, 55(4), 998-1021. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131945 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2131945

Clifford, S. (2019). How Emotional Frames Moralize and Polarize Political Attitudes. Political Psychology, 40(1), 75-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12507

Dalton, R. J. (2000). Value change and democracy. In R. D. P. Susan J. Pharr (Ed.), Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries? Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691186849-015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691186849-015

Del-Castillo-Feito, C., Cachón-Rodríguez, G., y Paz-Gil, I. (2022). Political Disaffection, Sociodemographic, and Psychographic Variables as State Legitimacy Determinants in the European Union. American Behavioral Scientist, 66(1), 86-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220981116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220981116

Downs, A., y Merino, L. A. M. (1973). Teoría económica de la democracia. Aguilar.

Druckman, J., Green, D., Kuklinski, J., y Lupia, A. (2006). The Growth and Development Science. American Political Science Review, 100(4), 627-635. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055406062514 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055406062514

Fernández, L., y Morán, M. (2014). Encontrar la cultura: estrategias de indagación para el análisis sociopolítico. Revista de Estudios Sociales, 50, 43-56. https://doi.org/10.7440/res50.2014.07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7440/res50.2014.07

Ferrín, M., Fraile, M., García-Albacete, G. M., y Gómez, R. (2020). The gender gap in political interest revisited. International Political Science Review, 41(4), 473-489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512119860260 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512119860260

Fraile, M., y de Miguel, C. (2022). Risk and the gender gap in internal political efficacy in Europe. West European Politics, 45(7), 1462-1480. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1969146 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1969146

Fraile, M., y Sánchez-Vítores, I. (2020). Tracing the Gender Gap in Political Interest Over the Life Span: A Panel Analysis. Political Psychology, 41(1), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12600 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12600

Inglehart, R. (2005). Modernización y cambio cultural: la persistencia de los valores tradicionales. Quaderns de La Mediterrània= Cuadernos Del Mediterráneo, 5, 21-32

Jenkins, L. (2018). Why do all our feelings about politics matter? British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 20(1), 191-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117746917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117746917

Jiménez, F. (2016). Los efectos de la corrupción sobre la desafección y el cambio político en España. In La corrupción en España (pp. 49-67). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Magni, G. (2017). It’s the emotions, Stupid! Anger about the economic crisis, low political efficacy, and support for populist parties. Electoral Studies, 50, 91-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.09.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.09.014

Meer, T. W. G. Van Der. (2017). Democratic input, macroeconomic output and political trust. In Handbook on Political Trust (pp. 270-284). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782545118.00028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782545118.00028

Megías, A. (2018). Desafección política ¿estructura o coyuntura? : un estudio profundo en el contexto actual de crisis [Universidad de Murcia]. http://hdl.handle.net/10201/65840

Megías, A. (2020a). Changes in the nature of a decade-long crisis of disaffection. Revista Espanola de Investigaciones Sociologicas, 169, 103-122. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.169.103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.169.103

Megías, A. (2020b). No es la economía, estúpido. La evolución del perfil del desafecto español pre y postcrisis. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 52, 85-120. https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.52.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.52.04

Megías, A., y Moreno, C. (2022). Political disaffection in Spain’s European neighbours: a stable attitude? Revista Espanola

de Investigaciones Sociologicas, 179(September), 103-124. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.179.103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.179.103

Megias, A. (2018). Desafección Política ¿Estructura o Coyuntura? Un Estudio Profundo en el Contexto Actual de Crisis. Universidad de Murcia.

Morán, M. L. (2011). La Cultura Política en España: interrogantes, debates y aportaciones. In UNAM (Ed.), Cincuenta años de la cultura cívica: pensamientos y reflexiones en honor al profesor Sidney Verba (pp. 101-122). Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas. https://eprints.ucm.es/42861/

Moreno, C., y Seisdedos, S. R. (2024). El género en el voto. In P. Oñate, J. M. Rivera, y C. Ortega (Eds.), Las elecciones generales de noviembre de 2019 (pp.173-187). Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS).

Norris, P. (2011). Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973383 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973383

Nussbaum, M. (2008). Paisajes del pensamiento: La inteligencia de las emociones. Paidós. https://books.google.es/books?id=TLApnxW1VR4C

Nussbaum, M. (2014). Emociones políticas: ¿Por qué el amor es importante para la justicia? Ediciones Paidós.

Olumsuz, T., Kişilerin, D., Karar, S., y Nasil, S. (2021). How Do The Main Negative Emotions Affect People ’ s Political Decision Process ? : “Fear, Anxiety And Anger”. Journal of Academic Inquiries, 16(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.17550/akademikincelemeler.708916 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17550/akademikincelemeler.708916

Weber, C. (2013). Emotions, Campaigns, and Political Participation. Political Research Quarterly, 66(2), 414-428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912912449697 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912912449697

Wildavsky, A. (1987). Choosing Preferences by Constructing Institutions: A Cultural Theory of Preference Formation. American Political Science Review, 81(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1960776 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1960776

Published

2024-12-20

How to Cite

Lucena Cid, I. V. (2024). Deontic powers and reasons to act independently of desire. International Journal of Political Thought, 19, 291–304. https://doi.org/10.46661/revintpensampolit.10500

Issue

Section

Estudios Varios