Bodies, signs and spaces: about panoptic architecture of urinary segregation

Abstract

The question to begin: How is it possible to think dynamic interceptions between bodies, signs and spaces? Introduction presents, Foucault, Halperin and Witting dialogue exercise in order to clarify that sexuality device is heterogeneous in its heterogeneity of displays. The second part briefly describes the genealogy of the elaboration of techno-gender concept within transfeminism. This allows to build a lectern to enable the thinking of heteronormative sexuality device, configured by somatopolitic fictions held in segregative categories, which bases are devices verification, body techniques, government regimes, and architectural designs of spaces, where binary gender (Men/Women) is the effect of technologies that produce contextually situated subjects. The third part axis is the study of Foucalt’s panopticon in Guard and punish; with some ideas of Lacan, Allouch and Preciado to argue why panoptic surveillance of genders is considerate urinary segregation. Conclusion gathers ideas about segregation problem whose basis is binary thinking, with the invitation to approach the minority befall of bodies and the critical study of the scientific-technical discourses of modernity.