Hypnotic Security and Democracy in the Age of the Digital Panopticon
from Hobbes to Pegasus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46661/revintpensampolit.12501Keywords:
security, techno-capitalism, surveillance, democracy, algorithms, biopolitics, securitization, data, demopedia , transparencyAbstract
This article critically analyzes the transformation of the concept of security from classical modernity to the current techno-capitalist era and its implications for democracy. Through a genealogy that begins with Hobbes’s theory of the Leviathan State and extends to the digital challenges of 2025, it shows how the notion of security has shifted from a guarantee against fear and violence to an ideological device that stabilizes the status quo of global capitalism. The theoretical framework combines ideological critique, biopolitics, securitization theory, and data surveillance studies in order to unravel the contemporary mechanisms of algorithmic social control. Current cases are examined — such as the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (2024), the reauthorization of FISA §702 in the US (2024), algorithmic changes in Twitter/X (2024), and the criminalization of the climate collective Letzte Generation in Germany — which exemplify the tension between security, technology, and civil liberties. In the conclusion, several initiatives are anticipated for further development — including demopedia, algorithmic transparency, data unions, and public platforms — aimed at redirecting security toward the democratic public interest, while anticipating possible objections and offering responses. The remainder of the conclusion underscores the urgency of restoring citizen control over digital infrastructures and outlines a future research agenda to strengthen democracy in the face of the hypnotic logic of techno-capitalist security.
Downloads
References
Agamben, G. (2005). Estado de excepción (2.ª ed., M. G. Alemany, Trad.). Adriana Hidalgo. (Obra original publicada 2003)
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (M. Ritter, Trad.). SAGE. (Obra original publicada 1986)
Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Lynne Rienner.
Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3-7. https://doi.org/10.2307/778828
Foucault, M. (2007). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-1978 (M. Senellart, Ed.; G. Burchell, Trad.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Graham, T., & Andrejevic, M. (2024). A computational analysis of potential algorithmic bias on Platform X during the 2024 US election [Preprint].
Queensland University of Technology. https://github.com/timothyjgraham/AlgorithmicBiasX
Han, B.-C. (2014). Psychopolitik: Neoliberalismus und die neuen Machttechniken. S. Fischer.
Han, B.-C. (2014). Psicopolítica: Neoliberalismo y nuevas técnicas de poder (A. Bergés, Trad.). Herder.
Lessig, L. (2006). Code: Version 2.0. Basic Books.
Neocleous, M. (2008). Critique of Security. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. NYU Press.
Pasquale, F. (2015). The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Harvard University Press.
Penney, J. W. (2016). Chilling effects: Online surveillance and Wikipedia use. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 31(1), 117-182.
Reuters (Alkousaa, R., & Jabkhiro, J.). (2023, 10 agosto). Europe cracks down after rise in ‘direct action’ climate protests. Reuters.
Sankin, A., & Mattu, S. (2023, 2 octubre). Predictive-policing software terrible at predicting crimes. The Markup.
Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform Capitalism. Polity.
Statewatch (Jones, C.). (2025, 29 abril). EU’s secretive “security AI” plans need critical, democratic scrutiny. Statewatch Analysis. https://www.statewatch.org/analysis/2025/eu-security-ai-plans
Viljoen, S. (2021). Democratic data: A relational theory for data governance. Yale Law Journal, 131(2), 573-654.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jose María Seco Martínez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Open access policy
Free and open access is allowed to any interested party to all the contents of the journal issues, free of charge, being able to print and transfer all the articles, with the only condition of specifying the source and authorship.
The journal: a) does not charge authorship costs for the processing of articles or for their submission, b) maintains copyright for authors without restrictions, c) facilitates authors to keep their publication rights without limitations.
The International Journal of Political Thought is an original work of the Laboratory of Political Ideas and Practices of the Pablo de Olavide University. All articles included in the Journal are original work of their respective authors. This Journal is freely offered to the scientific and academic community at no cost and releases the contents according to the license "Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 CC BY-NC-SA" of the Creative Commons project available in the following url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode
If you wish to translate or compile any of the articles available here, please contact us at contacto








ISSN: 1885-589X
Universidad Pablo de Olavide