The core technology behind and beyond ChatGPT
A comprehensive review of language models in educational research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.8449Keywords:
ChatGPT, Language model, EdTech, AIAbstract
ChatGPT has garnered significant attention within the education industry. Given the core technology behind ChatGPT is language model, this study aims to critically review related publications and suggest future direction of language model in educational research. We aim to address three questions: i) what is the core technology behind ChatGPT, ii) what is the state of knowledge of related research and iii) the potential research direction. A critical review of related publications was conducted in order to evaluate the current state of knowledge of language model in educational research. In addition, we further suggest a purpose oriented guiding framework for future research of language model in education. Our study promptly responded to the concerns raised by ChatGPT from the education industry and offers the industry with a comprehensive and systematic overview of related technologies. We believe this is the first time that a study has been conducted to systematically review the state of knowledge of language model in educational research.
Downloads
References
Ba, S., Hu, X., Stein, D. & Liu, Q. (2023). Assessing cognitive presence in online inquiry-based discussion through text classification and epistemic network analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54, 247-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13285 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13285
Baron, N. (2023). Even kids are worried ChatGPT will make them lazy plagiarists, says a linguist who studies tech’s effect on reading, writing and thinking. Fortune. https://fortune.com/2023/01/19/what-is-chatgpt-ai-effect-cheating-plagiarism-laziness-education-kids-students/
Bengio, Y. & Senecal, J.S. (2008). Adaptive importance sampling to accelerate training of a neural probabilistic language model. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 19(4), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2007.912312 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2007.912312
Beseiso, M., Alzubi, O.A. & Rashaideh, H. (2021). A novel automated essay scoring approach for reliable higher educational assessments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 33(3), 727-746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09283-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09283-1
Botarleanu, R.M., Dascalu, M., Allen, L.K., Crossley, S.A. & McNamara, D.S. (2021). Automated Summary Scoring with ReaderBench. In A. Cristea & C. Troussas (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2021), 321-332. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80421-3_35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80421-3_35
Condor, A. (2020). Exploring automatic short answer grading as a tool to assist in human rating. In I. Bittencourt, M. Cukurova, K. Muldner, R. Luckin, & E. Millan (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2020). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52240-7_14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52240-7_14
Dempsey, J. (2023). AI: Arguing its Place in Higher Education. Higher Education Digest. https://www.highereducationdigest.com/ai-arguing-its-place-in-higher-education/
Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K. & Toutanova, K. (2018). Bert: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv,1810.04805v2 https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1810.04805
Dimzon, F.D. & Pascual, R.M. (2020). An automatic phoneme recognizer for children’s filipino read speech. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE), Takamatsu, Japan, 2020,1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE48869.2020.9368399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE48869.2020.9368399
Van-Dis, E.A.M., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., Van-Rooij, R. and Bockting, C.L. (2023). ChatGPT: five priorities for research. Nature, 614(7947), 224–226. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7
Du, H., Xing, W. & Pei, B. (2021). Automatic text generation using deep learning: providing large-scale support for online learning communities. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1993932 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1993932
Dyulicheva, Y.Y. (2021). Learning Analytics in MOOCS as an Instrument for Measuring Math Anxiety. Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2021-4-243-265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2021-4-243-265
Esmaeilzadeh, S., Williams, B., Shamsi, D. & Vikingstad, O. (2022). Providing insights for open-response surveys via end-to-end context-aware clustering. In M. Rodrigo, N. Matsuda, A. Cristea, & V. Dimitrova (Eds), Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2022). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_44 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_44
Fernandez, N., Ghosh, A., Liu, N., Wang, Z., Choffin, B., Baraniuk, R. & Lan, A. (2022). Automated scoring for reading comprehension via in-context BERT tuning. In M. Rodrigo, N. Matsuda, A. Cristea, & V. Dimitrova (Eds). Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2022). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_69 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_69
Firoozi, T., Mohammadi, H. & Gierl, M.J. (2022). Using active learning methods to strategically select essays for automated scoring. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice, 00, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12537 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12537
Fitzpatrick, D. (2023). Overcoming ChatGPT fear in 3 steps. FE News. https://www.fenews.co.uk/exclusive/overcoming-chatgpt-fear-in-3-steps/
Geller, S.A., Gal, K., Segal, A., Sripathi, K., Kim, H.G., Facciotti, M.T., Igo, M., et al. (2021). New methods for confusion detection in course forums: student, teacher, and machine. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 14(5), 665-679. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2021.3123266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2021.3123266
Gift, T. & Norman, J. (2023). AI makes university honour codes more necessary than ever. Times Higher Education (THE). https://www.timeshighereducation.com/blog/ai-makes-university-honour-codes-more-necessary-ever
Goel, V., Sahnan, D., Venktesh, V., Sharma, G., Dwivedi, D. & Mohania, M. (2022). K-12BERT: BERT for K-12 education. In M. Rodrigo, N. Matsuda, A. Cristea, & V. Dimitrova (Eds), Artificial Intelligence in Education: Posters and Late Breaking Results. Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners and Doctoral Consortium (AIED 2022). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11647-6_123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11647-6_123
Goldberg, Y. & Levy, O. (2014). Word2vec Explained: deriving Mikolov et al.’s negative-sampling word-embedding method. arXi. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1402.3722
Greenhouse, S. (2023). US experts warn AI likely to kill off jobs – and widen wealth inequality. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/feb/08/ai-chatgpt-jobs-economy-inequality
Han, X., Zhang, Z., Ding, N., Gu, Y., Liu, X., Huo, Y., Qiu, J., et al. (2021). Pre-trained models: Past, present and future. AI Open, 2, 225–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.08.002
Hao, Y., Li, H., Ding, W., Wu, Z., Tang, J., Luckin, R. & Liu, Z. (2021). Multi-task learning based online dialogic instruction detection with pre-trained language models. In I. Roll, D. McNamara, S. Sosnovsky, R. Luckin & V. Dimitrova (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2021). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78270-2_33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78270-2_33
Hess, F. (2023). Will ChatGPT Be A Blow To Learning, Or A Boon? We’ll Decide. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/frederickhess/2023/02/08/will-chatgpt-be-a-blow-to-learning-or-a-boon-well-decide/
Hsu, H.H. & Huang, N.F. (2022). Xiao-Shih: a self-enriched question answering bot with machine learning on Chinese-based MOOCs. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies,15(2), 223-237. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2022.3162572 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2022.3162572
Ibanez, M., Reyes, L.L.A., Sapinit, R., Hussien, M.A. & Imperial, J.M. (2022). On applicability of neural language models for readability assessment in Filipino. In M. Rodrigo, N. Matsuda, A. Cristea, & V. Dimitrova (Eds). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners and Doctoral Consortium (AIED 2022). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11647-6_118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11647-6_118
Jayaraman, J.D. & Black, J. (2022). Effectiveness of an Intelligent Question Answering System for Teaching Financial Literacy: A Pilot Study. In D. Guralnick, M. Auer & A. Poce (Eds.), Innovations in Learning and Technology for the Workplace and Higher Education (TLIC 2021). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90677-1_13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90677-1_13
Khot, T., Clark, P., Guerquin, M., Jansen, P. & Sabharwal, A. (2020). QASC: A Dataset for Question Answering via sentence composition. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 34(5). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6319
Khushk, A., Zhiying, L., Yi, X. & Zengtian, Z. (2023). Technology Innovation in STEM Education: A Review and Analysis. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 19, 29–51. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.7883 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.7883
Lee, J., Soleimani, F., Irish, I., Hosmer, J., Soylu, M.Y., Finkelberg, R. & Chatterjee, S. (2022). Predicting cognitive presence in at-scale online learning: MOOC and for-credit online course environments. Online Learning, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i1.3060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i1.3060
Lee, M.C., Chang, J.W. & Chen, J.L. (2014). Detecting ESL/EFL grammatical errors based on n-grams and web resources. Conference name: 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN14 Proceedings), 345-351.
Leong, K., Sung, A., Au, D., & Blanchard, C. (2020). A review of the trend of microlearning. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 13(1), 88-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-10-2020-0044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-10-2020-0044
Leydesdorff, L. & Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Conference report: Can ‘the public’ be considered as a fourth helix in university-industry-government relations? Report on the Fourth Triple Helix Conference, 2002. Science and Public Policy, 30(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154303781780678 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3152/147154303781780678
Li, H. (2022). Language models: past, present, and future. Communications of the ACM, 65(7), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490443 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3490443
Li, Y., Anastasopoulos, A. and Black, A.W. (2020). Towards Minimal Supervision BERT-Based Grammar Error Correction. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-20), 34(10), 13859-13860. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i10.7202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i10.7202
Lin, J. (2020). Hybrid translation and language model for micro learning material recommendation. 2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2020), 384-386. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT49669.2020.00121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT49669.2020.00121
Liu, Q., Liu, T., Zhao, J., Fang, Q., Ding, W., Wu, Z., Xia, F., et al. (2021). Solving ESL sentence completion questions via pre-trained neural language models. In I. Roll, D. McNamara, S. Sosnovsky, R. Luckin & V. Dimitrova (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2021). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78270-2_46 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78270-2_46
López-Belmonte, J., Segura-Robles, A., Cho, W. C., Parra-González, M.E. & Moreno-Guerrero, A. J. (2021). What does literature teach about digital pathology? A bibliometric study in Web of Science. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, (16), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.4918 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.4918
Lopez-Ferrero, C., Renau, I., Nazar, R. & Torner, S. (2014). Computer-assisted revision in Spanish academic texts: Peer-assessment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,141, 470-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.083 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.083
Lu, X., Sahay, S., Yu, Z. & Nachman, L. (2021). ACAT-G: An Interactive Learning Framework for Assisted Response Generation. Thirty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-21), 35(18), 16084-16086. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v35i18.18019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v35i18.18019
Makhlouf, J. & Mine, T. (2021). Mining students’ comments to build an automated feedback system. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU),1. SciTePress. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010372200150025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5220/0010372200150025
Masala, M., Ruseti, S., Dascalu, M. & Dobre, C. (2021). Extracting and clustering main ideas from student feedback using language models. In I. Roll, D. McNamara, S. Sosnovsky, R. Luckin & V. Dimitrova (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2021). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78292-4_23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78292-4_23
Meisner, C. (2023). Baylor professors fear students will lose critical thinking skills with ChatGPT. Baylot Lariat. https://baylorlariat.com/2023/02/07/baylor-professors-fear-students-will-lose-critical-thinking-skills-with-chatgpt/
Moore, S., Nguyen, H.A., Bier, N., Domadia, T. & Stamper, J. (2022). Assessing the quality of student-generated short answer questions using GPT-3. In I. Hilliger, P. Munoz-Merino, T. DeLaet, A. Ortega-Arranz, & T. Farrell (Eds.), Educating for a New Future: Making Sense of Technology-Enhanced Learning Adoption. EC-TEL 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13450. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16290-9_18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16290-9_18
Murray, B. (2023). ChatGPT forces us to rethink student effort and laziness. Psychology Today.https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/real-happiness-in-a-digital-world/202301/chatgpt-forces-us-to-rethink-student-effort-and
Ndukwe, I.G., Amadi, C.E., Nkomo, L.M. & Daniel, B.K. (2020). Automatic grading system using sentence-BERT network. In I. Bittencourt, M. Cukurova, K. Muldner, R. Luckin, & E. Millan (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2020). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52240-7_41 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52240-7_41
Nehyba, J. & Stefanik, M. (2022). Applications of deep language models for reflective writings. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 2961-2999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11254-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11254-7
Nicula, B., Dascalu, M., Newton, N., Orcutt, E. & McNamara, D.S. (2021). Automated paraphrase quality assessment using recurrent neural networks and language models. In A. Cristea & C. Troussas (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2021). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80421-3_36 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80421-3_36
Ondas, S., Hladek, D., Stas, J., Juhar, J., Kovacs, L. & Baksane, E.V. (2015). Semantic roles modeling using statistical language models. 2015 13th International Conference on Emerging Elearning Technologies and Applications (Iceta). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETA.2015.7558502 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETA.2015.7558502
Pan, L. (2018). Automatic generation of children’s songs based on machine statistic learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(3), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i03.8367 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i03.8367
Parasa, N.S., Diwan, C. & Srinivasa, S. (2022). Automatic riddle generation for learning resources. In M., Rodrigo, N., Matsuda, A., Cristea, & V., Dimitrova (Eds). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners and Doctoral Consortium (AIED 2022). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11647-6_66 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11647-6_66
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K. & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018). Deep contextualized word representations. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 1, 2227–2237. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-1202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-1202
Q.ai (2023). Here Comes the Bing Chatbot - Microsoft’s ChatGPT For Search Has Arrived, Forcing Google’s Hand. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/qai/2023/02/09/here-comes-the-bing-chatbotmicrosofts-chatgpt-for-search-has-arrived-forcing-googles-hand/?sh=6315ec6110fb
Rakovic, M., Sha, L., Nagtzaam, G., Young, N., Stratmann, P., Gasevic, D. & Chen, G. (2022). Towards the automated evaluation of legal casenote essays. In M., Rodrigo, N., Matsuda, A., Cristea, & V., Dimitrova (Eds), Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2022). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_14
Rosen, P. (2023). ChatGPT’s creator OpenAI has doubled in value since 2021 as the language bot goes viral and Microsoft pours in $10 billion. Markets Insider. https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/chatgpt-openai-valuation-bot-microsoft-language-google-tech-stock-funding-2023-1#:~:text=OpenAI%2C%20the%20parent%20company%20of
Rosenfeld, R. (2000). Two decades of statistical language modeling: where do we go from here? Proceedings of the IEEE, 88(8), 1270–1278. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.880083 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/5.880083
Salim, S. (2023). UAE jobs and ChatGPT: Over 70% workers must learn new skills by 2025, says expert. Khaleej Times. https://www.khaleejtimes.com/jobs/uae-jobs-should-employees-worry-about-chatgpt-other-ai-tools-replacing-them
Sanghvi, S. & Westhoff, M. (2022). Education technology: Five trends to watch in the EdTech industry. Mckinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/education/our-insights/five-trends-to-watch-in-the-edtech-industry
Sung, C., Dhamecha, T.I. & Mukhi, N. (2019). Improving short answer grading using transformer-based pre-training. In S. Isotani, E. Millan, A. Ogan, P. Hastings, B. McLaren, and R. Luckin (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2019). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23204-7_39 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23204-7_39
Tang, L., Ke, E., Singh, N., Feng, B., Austin, D., Verma, N. & Drori, I. (2022). Solving probability and statistics problems by probabilistic program synthesis at human level and predicting solvability. In M., Rodrigo, N., Matsuda, A., Cristea, & V., Dimitrova (Eds.). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners and Doctoral Consortium (AIED 2022). Spinger. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11647-6_127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11647-6_127
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, L., et al. (2017). Attention is all you need. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1706.03762
Wang, Z., Valdez, J., Mallick, D.B. & Baraniuk, R.G. (2022). Towards human-like educational question generation with large language models. In M., Rodrigo, N., Matsuda, A., Cristea, & V., Dimitrova (Eds). Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2022). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_13
Westfall, C. (2023). Educators Battle Plagiarism As 89% Of Students Admit To Using OpenAI’s ChatGPT For Homework. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/chriswestfall/2023/01/28/educators-battle-plagiarism-as-89-of-students-admit-to-using-open-ais-chatgpt-for-homework/
Wise, A.F., Cui, Y. & Jin, W.Q. (2017). Honing in on social learning networks in MOOC forums: examining critical network definition decisions. Proceedings of the International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference (Lak’17), 383-392. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027446 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027446
Wulff, P., Buschhueter, D., Westphal, A., Mientus, L., Nowak, A. & Borowski, A. (2022). Bridging the gap between qualitative and quantitative assessment in science education research with machine learning - a case for pretrained language models-based clustering. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31, 490-513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09969-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09969-w
Xiao, C., Shi, L., Cristea, A., Li, Z. & Pan, Z. (2022). Fine-grained Main Ideas Extraction and Clustering of Online Course Reviews. In M. Rodrigo, N. Matsuda, A. Cristea, & V. Dimitrova (Eds). Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2022). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_24
Xu, S., Ding, W. & Liu, Z. (2020). Automatic Dialogic Instruction Detection for K-12 Online One-on-One Classes. In I. Bittencourt, M. Cukurova, K. Muldner, R. Luckin, & E. Millan (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2020). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52240-7_62 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52240-7_62
Xu, S., Xu, G., Jia, P., Ding, W., Wu, Z. & Liu, Z. (2021). Automatic Task Requirements Writing Evaluation via Machine Reading Comprehension. In I. Roll, D. McNamara, S. Sosnovsky, R. Luckin & V. Dimitrova (Eds.). Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2021). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78292-4_36 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78292-4_36
Yang, G., Wen, D., Kinshuk, Chen, N.S. & Sutinen, E. (2012). Personalized Text Content Summarizer for Mobile Learning: An Automatic Text Summarization System with Relevance Based Language Model.2012 IEEE Fourth International Conference on Technology for Education. https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2012.23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2012.23
Zhu, X., Wu, H. & Zhang, L. (2022). Automatic short-answer grading via BERT-based deep neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 15(3), 364-375. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2022.3175537 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2022.3175537
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Kelvin Leong, Anna Sung, Lewis Jones
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.