The use of ai-powered applications for english language content generation

attitudes and practices of pre-service teachers

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.12960

Abstract

This research study aimed to explore pre-service English teachers’ attitudes toward AI and their use of it in micro-teaching. It sought to investigate whether key factors such as perceived usefulness, ease of use, AI anxiety, AI output quality, and facilitating conditions had a positive or negative impact on their attitudes and use of AI. The study employed a mixed-method approach to collect data, including using a questionnaire and conducting interviews. Hence, 100 respondents answered the questionnaire, and 5 participants took part in the interview. The main findings revealed that pre-service English teachers have positive attitudes toward AI integration and use in teaching profession. Additionally, it identified several uses of AI in their micro-teaching sessions, with lesson planning and the suggestion of instructional materials being the most common. The study also revealed that perceived AI usefulness and ease of use played a significant role for shaping positive attitudes among pre-service English teachers. However, their attitudes were found to be negatively affected by AI anxiety. Finally, the study highlighted multiple implications for teacher education programs and pre-service teachers to enhance their pedagogical knowledge and professional performance as well as ensuring effective implementation and responsible use of AI in teaching.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aksu, H. (2009). Questionnaries and Interviews in Educational Researches. Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences, 13(1).

Alejandro, I. M. v., Sanchez, J. M. P., Sumalinog, G. G., Mananay, J. A., Goles, C. E., & Fernandez, C. B. (2024). Pre-service Teachers’ Technology Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Applications in Education. STEM Education, 4(4), 445–465. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2024024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2024024

Alhalangy, A. G. I., & Abdalgane, M. (2023). Exploring The Impact of AI on the EFL Context: A Case Study of Saudi Universities. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 23(2), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v23i2.125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v23i2.125

Alharbi, M. (2024). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Advancing English as A Foreign Language Teaching at Saudi Universities. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 16(3), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v16i3.9311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v16i3.9311

Ali, I., Warraich, N. F., & Butt, K. (2024). Acceptance and Use of Artificial Intelligence and AI-based Applications in Education: A Meta-analysis and Future Direction. Information Development, 41(3 Special Issue: “Artificial Intelligence Initiatives”), 859–874. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669241257206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669241257206

Alvarez, L., Ortoleva, G., Widmer, D. S., Fritz, M., Bugmann, J., Boéchat-Heer, S., & Ramillon, C. (2024). Future Teachers’ Beliefs about Generative AI. Assessing Technology Acceptance as Students or as Aspiring Professionals. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 32(3), 383-408.‏ https://doi.org/10.70725/379206cljimb DOI: https://doi.org/10.70725/379206cljimb

Ayanwale, M. A., Adelana, O. P., Molefi, R. R., Adeeko, O., & Ishola, A. M. (2024). Examining Artificial Intelligence Literacy among Pre-service Teachers for Future Classrooms. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100179 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100179

Ayanwale, M. A., Frimpong, E. K., Opesemowo, O. A. G., & Sanusi, I. T. (2024). Exploring Factors That Support Pre-service Teachers’ Engagement in Learning Artificial Intelligence. Journal for STEM Education Research, 8(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-024-00121-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-024-00121-4

Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Stürmer, K., & Scheiter, K. (2021). Variability of Teachers’ Technology Integration in the Classroom: A Matter of Utility! Computers and Education, 166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104159 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104159

Bae, H., Hur, J., Park, J., Choi, G. W., & Moon, J. (2024). Pre-Service Teachers’ Dual Perspectives on Generative AI: Benefits, Challenges, and Integration into their Teaching and Learning. Online Learning Journal, 28(3), 131–156. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.4543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.4543

Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52-62.‏ https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4337484 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500

Bautista, A., Estrada, C., Jaravata, A. M., Mangaser, L. M., Narag, F., Soquila, R., & Asuncion, R. J. (2024). Preservice Teachers’ Readiness Towards Integrating AI-Based Tools in Education: A TPACK Approach. Educational Process: International Journal, 13(3), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2024.133.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2024.133.3

Benali, M., & Boukare, M. (2023). Preservice Moroccan Language Teachers' Perspectives on Integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence into Their Teaching. Innovation, Technologies, Education & Communication, 7. https://doi.org/10.60590/PRSM.itec-iss7.105

Bergdahl, N., & Sjöberg, J. (2025). Attitudes, Perceptions and AI Self-efficacy in K-12 Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100358 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100358

Bozkurt, A., & Bae, H. (2024). May the Force Be with You JedAI: Balancing the Light and Dark Sides of Generative AI in the Educational Landscape. Online Learning Journal, 28(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i2.4563 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i2.4563

Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., & Järvelä, S. (2022). The Promises and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence for Teachers: A Systematic Review of Research. TechTrends, 66(4), 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y

Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ Voices on Generative AI: Perceptions, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8

Chand, R., Alasa, V, M., Chitiyo, J., & Pietrantoni, Z. (2022). Preparation of Pre-service Teachers: Assessment of Generation Z Students. In J. Keengwe (Eds), Handbook of Research on Digital-Based Assessment and Innovative Practices in Education (pp. 116-130). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-2468-1.ch006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-2468-1.ch006

Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510

Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., Cheng, G., & Liu, C. (2022). Two Decades of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Contributors, Collaborations, Research Topics, Challenges, and Future Directions. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 28–47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48647028

Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic Literature Review on Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Research Recommendations of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

Cojean, S., & Martin, N. (2022). Acceptability of Technology Involving Artificial Intelligence among Future Teachers. In J. Culbertson, A. Perfors, H. Rabagliati & V. Ramenzoni (Eds.), Proceedings of the 44th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. eScholarship. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4vp429tp

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). London: Pearson Education, Inc.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). London: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982

Davis, F. D. (1985). A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-user Information Systems: Theory and Results [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/15192

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.294

Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in Second Language Research: Construction, Administration, and Processing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606525 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606525

Edmett, A., Ichaporia, N., Crompton, H., & Crichton, R. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and English Language Teaching: Preparing for the Future. British Council. https://doi.org/10.57884/78ea-3c69

Eyüp, B., & Kayhan, S. (2023). Pre-Service Turkish Language Teachers’ Anxiety and Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 11(4), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.11n.4p.43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.11n.4p.43

Falebita, O. (2024). Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Among Pre-Service Teachers in University Teacher Education Programs. Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v4i1.309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v4i1.309

Fazio, R. H. (1989). On the Power and Functionality of Attitudes: The Role of Attitude Accessibility. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude Structure and Function (pp. 153–179). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315801780 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315801780

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Reading, Mass. https://doi.org/10.2307/2065853 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2065853

Fu, S., Gu, H., & Yang, B. (2020). The Affordances of AI-enabled Automatic Scoring Applications on Learners’ Continuous Learning Intention: An Empirical Study in China. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(5), 1674–1692. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12995 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12995

Galindo-Domínguez, H., Delgado, N., Losada, D., & Etxabe, J. M. (2024). An Analysis of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Education in Spain: The In-service Teacher’s Perspective. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 40(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2023.2284726 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2023.2284726

Gningue, S. M., Peach, R., Jarrah, A. M., & Wardat, Y. (2022). The Relationship between Teacher Leadership and School Climate: Findings from a Teacher-Leadership Project. Education Sciences, 12(11), 749. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110749 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110749

Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255

Guan, L., Zhang, Y., & Gu, M. M. (2025). Pre-service Teachers Preparedness for AI-integrated Education: An Investigation from Perceptions, Capabilities, and Teachers’ Identity Changes. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100341

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105–117). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2001.0472a.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2001.0472a.x

Harakchiyska, T., & Vassilev, T. (2024). Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions of AI and Its Implementation in the Foreign (English) Language Classroom. Strategies for Policy in Science and Education, 32(5s), 218–232. https://doi.org/10.53656/str2024-5s-22-pre DOI: https://doi.org/10.53656/str2024-5s-22-pre

Harry, A. (2023). Role of AI in Education. Interdiciplinary Journal and Hummanity, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.58631/injurity.v2i3.52 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58631/injurity.v2i3.52

Hiniz, G. (2024). A Year of Generative AI in English Language Teaching and Learning-A Case Study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2024.2404132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2024.2404132

Hochschild, J. L. (2009) Conducting Intensive Interviews and Elite Interviews. In M. Lamont, & P. White (Eds.), Workshop on Interdisciplinary Standards for Systematic Qualitative Research (pp. 124–133). National Science Foundation.

Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the Art and Practice in AI in Education. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 542–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533

Hur, J. W. (2024). Fostering AI Literacy: Overcoming Concerns and Nurturing Confidence among Preservice Teachers. Information and Learning Sciences, 126(1–2), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-11-2023-0170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-11-2023-0170

Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014

Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224

Kabudi, T., Pappas, I., & Olsen, D. H. (2021). AI-enabled Adaptive Learning Systems: A Systematic Mapping of the Literature. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100017

Karataş, F., & Yüce, E. (2024). AI and the Future of Teaching: Preservice Teachers’ Reflections on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Open and Distributed Learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 304–325. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7785 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7785

Karina, B. D., & Kastuhandani, F. C. (2024). Pre-Service English Teachers’ Lived Experience in Using AI in Teaching Preparation. Edunesia : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 5(1), 550–568. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v5i1.767 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v5i1.767

Kaya, F., Aydin, F., Schepman, A., Rodway, P., Yetişensoy, O., & Demir Kaya, M. (2022). The Roles of Personality Traits, AI Anxiety, and Demographic Factors in Attitudes toward Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40(2), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2151730 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2151730

Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and Applying Research Paradigms in Educational Contexts. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26

Koraishi, O. (2023). Teaching English in the Age of AI: Embracing ChatGPT to Optimize EFL Materials and Assessment. Language Education & Technology, 3(1), 55-72. https://langedutech.com/letjournal/index.php/let/article/view/48

Kusuma, I. P. I., Roni, M., Dewi, K. S., & Mahendrayana, G. (2024). Revealing the Potential of ChatGPT for English Language Teaching: EFL Preservice Teachers’ Teaching Practicum Experience. Studies in English Language and Education, 11(2), 650–670. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i2.34748 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i2.34748

Lameras, P., & Arnab, S. (2022). Power to the Teachers: An Exploratory Review on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Information,13(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13010014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info13010014

Law, L. (2024). Application of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in Language Teaching and Learning: A Scoping Literature Review. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100174

Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.01250 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01250

Liu, X., & Liu, Y. (2025). Developing and Validating a Scale of Artificial Intelligence Anxiety among Chinese EFL Teachers. European Journal of Education, 60(1), 12902. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12902 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12902

Ma, S., & Lei, L. (2024). The Factors Influencing Teacher Education Students’ Willingness to Adopt Artificial Intelligence Technology for Information-based Teaching. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 44(1), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2305155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2305155

Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology Acceptance Model: A Literature Review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1

Melweth, H. M. A., Alkahtani, A. S., Al Mdawi, A. M. M. & Badawy, W. B. M. (2024). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Improving the Quality of Education and Reducing Future Anxiety among a Sample of Teachers in Saudi Arabia. Kurdish Studies, 12(2), 5741–5758.‏ https://doi.org/10.58262/ks.v12i2.426

Merriam, S., & Tisdell, E. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Jossey-Bass.

Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Kereluik, K. (2009). The Song Remains the Same: Looking Back to the Future of Educational Technology. TechTrends, 53(5), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0325-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0325-3

Moorhouse, B. L. (2024). Beginning and First-year Language Teachers’ Readiness for the Generative AI Age. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100201

Morgan, D. L. (2007). Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained: Methodological Implications of Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292462

Mpolomoka, D. L., Luchembe, M., Mushibwe, C., Muvombo, M., Changala, M., Sampa, R. L., & Banda, S. (2025). Artificial Intelligence-related Plagiarism in Education: A Systematic Review. European Journal of Education Studies, 12(4), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v12i4.6029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v12i4.6029

Nyaaba, M., Shi, L., Nabang, M., Zhai, X., Kyeremeh, P., Ayoberd, S. A., & Akanzire, B. N. (2024). Generative AI as a Learning Buddy and Teaching Assistant: Pre-service Teachers' Uses and Attitudes. arXiv:2407.11983.‏ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.11983

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2005). On Becoming a Pragmatic Researcher: The Importance of Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(5), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570500402447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570500402447

Otsupius, I. (2014). Micro-Teaching: A Technique for Effective Teaching. African Research Review, 8(4), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v8i4.15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v8i4.15

Özer-Altınkaya, Z., & Yetkin, R. (2025). Exploring Pre-service English Language Teachers’ Readiness for AI-integrated Language Instruction. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 20(4), 584–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2025.2451299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2025.2451299

Özkan, E. K., Erdemir, N., & Coşkun, D. (2024). A Systematic Review of EFL Teachers’ Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence Technologies. Ihlara Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 150–168. https://doi.org/10.47479/ihead.1535035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47479/ihead.1535035

Park, S. Y. (2009). An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding University Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use e-Learning. Educational Technology and Society, 12(3), 150–162. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.12.3.150

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

Peres, R., Schreier, M., Schweidel, D., & Sorescu, A. (2023). On ChatGPT and Beyond: How Generative Artificial Intelligence May Affect Research, Teaching, and Practice. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 40(2), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2023.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2023.03.001

Pokrivcakova, S. (2023). Pre-service Teachers’ Attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence and Its Integration into EFL Teaching and Learning. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 11(3), 100–114. https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2023-0031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2023-0031

Qadir, J. (2022). Engineering Education in the Era of ChatGPT: Promise and Pitfalls of Generative AI for Education. TechRxiv. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.21789434.v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.21789434.v1

Qadir, J., Yau, K. L. A., Imran, M. A., & Al-Fuqaha, A. (2020). Engineering Education, Moving into 2020s : Essential Competencies for Effective 21st Century Electrical Computer Engineers. 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/gptse

Rehman, A. A., & Alharthi, K. (2016). An Introduction to Research Paradigms. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 3(8), 51–59. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:228253774

Runge, I., Hebibi, F., & Lazarides, R. (2025). Acceptance of Pre-service Teachers Towards Artificial Intelligence (AI): The Role of AI-related Teacher Training Courses and AI-TPACK Within the Technology Acceptance Model. Education Sciences, 15(2), 167. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020167

Samad, A., Hamza, M., Muazzam, A., Ahmer, A., Tariq, S., Ahmad, S., & Mumtaz, M. T. (2022). Current Perspectives on the Strategic Future of the Poultry Industry After the COVID-19 Outbreak. Brilliance: Research of Artificial Intelligence, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.47709/brilliance.v2i3.1597 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47709/brilliance.v2i3.1597

Saudi Data & AI Authority. (2023). Generative AI in Education. Sdaia.

Schepman, A., & Rodway, P. (2020). Initial Validation of the General Attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100014

Sibona, C., & Walczak, S. (2012). Purposive Sampling on Twitter: A Case Study. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.493 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.493

Sreenivasu, S. V. N., Sathesh Kumar, T., Hussain, O., Yeruva, A. R., Kabat, S. R., & Chaturvedi, A. (2023). Cloud Based Electric Vehicle’s Temperature Monitoring System Using IOT. Cybernetics and Systems, 56(6), 768–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/01969722.2023.2176649 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01969722.2023.2176649

Suchánová, z. (2023). AI Tools for Pre-service EFL Teachers: Exploring Applications and Implications. In M. Demirbilek, M. S. Ozturk, & M. Unal (Eds.), Proceedings of ICSES 2023—International Conference on Studies in Education and Social Sciences (pp. 638–654), Antalya, Turkiye. ISTES Organization.

Sumakul, D. T. Y. G., Hamied, F. A., & Sukyadi, D. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in EFL Classrooms: Friend or Foe? LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(1), 232-256.‏ https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/256723

Szajna, B. (1996). Empirical Evaluation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model. Management Science, 42(1), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.1.85 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.1.85

Taşçı, S., & Tunaz, M. (2024). Opportunities and Challenges in AI-assisted Language Teaching: Perceptions of Pre-service EFL Teachers. Research and Experience Journal, 9(2), 74–83.‏ https://doi.org/10.47214/adeder.1575897 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47214/adeder.1575897

Tashakkori A. Teddlie C. (Eds.). (2010). SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193

Thararattanasuwan, K., & Prachagool, V. (2024). Exploring Perspectives of Teacher Students Toward Generative AI Technologies. International Education Studies, 17(5), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v17n5p22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v17n5p22

Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing Pre-service Teachers to Integrate Technology in Education: A Synthesis of Qualitative Evidence. Computers and Education, 59(1), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009

Uwosomah, E. E., & Dooly, M. (2025). It Is Not the Huge Enemy: Preservice Teachers’ Evolving Perspectives on AI. Education Sciences, 15(2), 152. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020152

Van den Berg, G., & du Plessis, E. (2023). ChatGPT and Generative AI: Possibilities for Its Contribution to Lesson Planning, Critical Thinking and Openness in Teacher Education. Education Sciences, 13(10), 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100998 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100998

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Vogt, K., & Flindt, N. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Language.Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004678545_008

Teacher Education. A Critical Review of the Use of AI Tools in the Foreign Language Classroom. In P. Hohaus & J.-F. Heeren (Eds.), Innovating the Future of Teacher Education (pp. 179–199). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004678545_008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004678545_008

Wahyuni, D. (2012). The Research Design Maze: Understanding Paradigms, Cases, Methods and Methodologies. Journal of Applied Management and Accounting Research, 10(1), 69–80. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2103082

Wang, K., Ruan, Q., Zhang, X., Fu, C., & Duan, B. (2024). Pre-service Teachers’ GenAI Anxiety, Technology Self-Efficacy, and TPACK: Their Structural Relations with Behavioral Intention to Design GenAI-assisted Teaching. Behavioral Sciences, 14(5), 373. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14050373 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14050373

Wang, Y. Y., & Wang, Y. S. (2022). Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale: An Initial Application in Predicting Motivated Learning Behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(4), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1674887 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1674887

Yang, J. (2022). Perceptions of Preservice Teachers on AI Chatbots in English Education. International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication, 14(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.7236/IJIBC.2022.14.1.44

Yang, S. J. H. (2021). Guest Editorial: Precision Education - A New Challenge for AI in Education. Educational Technology & Society, 24(1), 105–108. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26977860

Yu, P. (2024). The Future Prospects of Deep Learning and Neural Networks: Artificial Intelligence’s Impact on Education. Applied and Computational Engineering, 33(1), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/33/20230239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/33/20230239

Zhai, X. (2023). ChatGPT for Next Generation Science Learning. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4331313 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4331313

Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Istenic, A., Spector, M., Liu, J. B., Yuan, J., & Li, Y. (2021). A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to 2020. Hindawi Complexity, 8812542,1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8812542

Zhang, C., Schießl, J., Plößl, L., Hofmann, F., & Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2023). Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence among Pre-service Teachers: A Multigroup Analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7

Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. B. (2021). AI Technologies for Education: Recent Research & Future Directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100025

Zhang, X., Sun, J., & Deng, Y. (2023). Design and Application of Intelligent Classroom for English Language and Literature Based on Artificial Intelligence Technology. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 37(1), 2216051. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2023.2216051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2023.2216051

Zheng, W., Ma, Z., Sun, J., Wu, Q., & Hu, Y. (2024). Exploring Factors Influencing Continuance Intention of Pre-service Teachers in Using Generative Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 41(16), 10325–10338. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2433300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2433300

Downloads

Published

2026-05-26

How to Cite

Althaqafi, A., & Alamri, A. (2026). The use of ai-powered applications for english language content generation: attitudes and practices of pre-service teachers. IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, (25), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.12960

Issue

Section

Artículos